Coronavirus Slowing PFAS Testing, Cleanup Efforts Across U.S.
Jeffrey Dintzer is quoted on how COVID-19 impacts testing and remediation of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl chemicals.
April 20, 2020 | Bloomberg Law
A&B Insights
The lawyers at Alston & Bird are on the front lines of PFAS litigation, enforcement, and regulation. For years, our attorneys have studied the increasing variety of legal claims in courts across the country alleging PFAS contamination and are respected as thought leaders for companies needing to protect their businesses from risk.
This section includes our team’s various articles, media placements, events, and speaking engagements.
Please note, a subscription may be required to view some of this content.
Read the PFAS Primer Quarterly Update
INSIGHT: Congress Confronts PFAS in National Defense Authorization Act–What You Need to Know
The 2020 National Defense Authorization Act and forthcoming regulatory action by the Environmental Protection Agency will directly impact industries that manufacture, process, or utilize PFAS chemicals. This article looks at the recent EPA actions and what to expect in the future for these forever chemicals.
March 20, 2020 | Bloomberg Law | Authors: Jeffrey Dintzer and Greg Berlin
California Takes the Lead in Regulating PFAS Chemicals in Drinking Water
California finds itself once again taking the lead by setting regulatory standards stricter than the rest of the nation. At issue is the nearly ubiquitous presence of certain PFAS chemicals in drinking water, a problem being addressed to varying degrees by many states and federal regulators.
February 24, 2020 | The Recorder | Authors: Jeffrey Dintzer and Peter Masaitis
‘Forever Chemicals’ Legacy Weighs on Chemours’ Future
Jeffrey Dintzer is quoted on the existential threat facing companies from per- and polyfuoralkyl (PFAS) cleanup liabilities.
November 4, 2019 | Bloomberg Environment
Decision on Standing in PFAS Cases Raises Serious Concerns
As litigation concerning the emerging contaminants known as “perfluoroalkyl” or “polyfluoroalkyl” substances (PFAS) has become increasingly common, the omnipresent nature of PFAS has created a troublesome issue for courts and litigants. In particular, courts have struggled to articulate the level of injury necessary to proceed on a claim that exposure to PFAS caused some kind of recoverable damage. A recent decision in Hardwick v. 3M Co. by a federal court in Ohio highlights the challenge. In that case, the court issued a ruling that watered down the standing requirement in PFAS cases and opened the door to litigation beyond the reach of common sense and at least 100 years of legal precedent.
October 23, 2019 | The Daily Journal