Southern District of New York Dismisses Contamination Suit Against DuPont and Denies Successor Jurisdiction Against DuPont Entities

ByPFAS Primer Team

The Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice a lawsuit filed by water management company Suez Water New York Inc. against E.I. du Pont Nemours & Company and its spinoffs for allegedly contaminating the state’s waterways and groundwater through the manufacture and disposal of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances. The court determined that Suez Water’s…

New Jersey Court Denies Dismissal of DuPont Entities in Contamination Suit

ByPFAS Primer Team

A New Jersey federal court refused to dismiss DuPont de Nemours Inc., also known as “New DuPont,” and Corteva Inc.’s motion to dismiss the two entities from a lawsuit filed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The state’s lawsuit alleges that E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, known as “Old DuPont” polluted…

Infrastructure Law Gears $10 Billion to Fight PFAS in Water

ByPFAS Primer Team

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act delivers more than $50 billion to the EPA to improve the nation’s drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure as well as rebuild bridges, roads, and tunnels. It includes $10 billion to address PFAS in drinking water, say Alston & Bird’s Jeffrey Dintzer and Gregory Berlin, who lay out the…

California Groundwater Agency PFAS Lawsuit Joins South Carolina MDL

ByPFAS Primer Team

The Water Replenishment District of Southern California claims that DuPont, 3M, and others polluted Los Angeles County’s drinking water. The District intends to spend $43 million to build plants that will remediate PFAS pollution, according to the complaint, and seeks to recover damages the District alleges they caused through the production of PFAS, including investigation,…

3M Reaches $12 Million Settlement to End Proposed Alabama Class Action

ByPFAS Primer Team

3M reached a $12 million settlement with Alabama’s West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority consumers who alleged 3M polluted their drinking water. The settlement is intended to compensate “ratepayers, household members and household owners” for the water distributed to homes by five water utilities from October 2013 through September 2016, when the suit was…